Kevin Fonseca v. American Red Cross

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Kevin Fonseca v. American Red Cross

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1520 Doc: 14 Filed: 10/20/2022 Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1520

KEVIN PETER FONSECA,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

AMERICAN RED CROSS; GAIL MCGOVERN; ANGELA POWLEY; BRANDI MCLENDON; DANIELLE BOWEN; CHRISTI MATHEWSON; DELORIS WILBORN; AVIS BUTTS; DOES 1-25,

Defendants – Appellees.

No. 22-1534

KEVIN PETER FONSECA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

I.B.T. TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 71; ERNEST WRENN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judges. (3:21-cv-00452- RJC-DSC; 3:21-cv-00369-MOC-DCK) USCA4 Appeal: 22-1520 Doc: 14 Filed: 10/20/2022 Pg: 2 of 3

Submitted: October 18, 2022 Decided: October 20, 2022

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Peter Fonseca, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Ryan Adams, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Charlotte, North Carolina; Trisha Suzanne Pande, PATTERSON HARKAVY, LLP, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 USCA4 Appeal: 22-1520 Doc: 14 Filed: 10/20/2022 Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Peter Fonseca appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaints

that challenged the American Red Cross’ decision to terminate his employment and the

adequacy of his union’s representation in the subsequent grievance proceedings. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Fonseca v. Am. Red Cross, No. 3:21-cv-00452-RJC-DSC

(W.D.N.C. Apr. 19, 2022); Fonseca v. I.B.T. Teamsters Loc. Union 71, No. 3:21-cv-00369-

MOC-DCK (W.D.N.C. May 9, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished