Jermaine Capel v. Chesapeake Sheriff Office

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Jermaine Capel v. Chesapeake Sheriff Office

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1178 Doc: 14 Filed: 10/20/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1178

JERMAINE M. CAPEL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHESAPEAKE SHERIFF’S OFFICE; JIM O’SULLIVAN; NURSE BULLOCH; DEPUTY LASSITER; DEPUTY RAMOS; LT. FLINT; DEPUTY GREEN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:20-cv-00129-AWA-LRL)

Submitted: October 18, 2022 Decided: October 20, 2022

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jermaine M. Capel, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1178 Doc: 14 Filed: 10/20/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Jermaine M. Capel appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal

brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Capel’s informal brief does not challenge the basis

for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s orders.

See Jackson v. Lightsey,

775 F.3d 170, 177

(4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an

important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved

in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Capel’s motions to

seal and to amend the informal brief are denied. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished