Dan Gramatic v. Kilolo Kijakazi
Dan Gramatic v. Kilolo Kijakazi
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1369 Doc: 19 Filed: 10/20/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1369
DAN C. GRAMATIC,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00903-CMH-TCB)
Submitted: October 18, 2022 Decided: October 20, 2022
Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dan C. Gramatic, Appellant Pro Se. Meghan Elizabeth Loftus, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1369 Doc: 19 Filed: 10/20/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Dan C. Gramatic seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his self-styled
motion to continue disability benefit payments and the district court’s order transferring
his case to the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46(1949). The orders Gramatic seeks to appeal are neither final
orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. See TechnoSteel, LLC v. Beers
Constr. Co.,
271 F.3d 151, 160-161(4th Cir. 2001) (holding that court of appeals lacks
jurisdiction to review transfer order once case file is transferred to court outside circuit and
nonappealable interlocutory or collateral decisions also transfer with case). Accordingly,
we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished