United States v. Trent Daniels

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Trent Daniels

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6331 Doc: 8 Filed: 10/21/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6331

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TRENT JERROD DANIELS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (3:18-cr-00873-JMC-1)

Submitted: October 18, 2022 Decided: October 21, 2022

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Trent Jerrod Daniels, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6331 Doc: 8 Filed: 10/21/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Trent Jerrod Daniels appeals the district court’s order denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s order

granting or denying a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States

v. Kibble,

992 F.3d 326, 329

(4th Cir.) (stating standard of review), cert. denied,

142 S. Ct. 383

(2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse

its discretion in analyzing the relevant

18 U.S.C. § 3553

(a) factors. See United States v.

High,

997 F.3d 181, 189

(4th Cir. 2021) (affirming district court’s order denying

compassionate release where “[t]he court’s rationale . . . was both rational and legitimate

under [

18 U.S.C. § 3553

(a)]” and “the court sufficiently explained its denial to allow for

meaningful appellate review” (internal quotation marks omitted)). We therefore affirm the

district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished