United States v. Trent Daniels
United States v. Trent Daniels
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6331 Doc: 8 Filed: 10/21/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TRENT JERROD DANIELS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (3:18-cr-00873-JMC-1)
Submitted: October 18, 2022 Decided: October 21, 2022
Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Trent Jerrod Daniels, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6331 Doc: 8 Filed: 10/21/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Trent Jerrod Daniels appeals the district court’s order denying his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s order
granting or denying a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States
v. Kibble,
992 F.3d 326, 329(4th Cir.) (stating standard of review), cert. denied,
142 S. Ct. 383(2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse
its discretion in analyzing the relevant
18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. See United States v.
High,
997 F.3d 181, 189(4th Cir. 2021) (affirming district court’s order denying
compassionate release where “[t]he court’s rationale . . . was both rational and legitimate
under [
18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)]” and “the court sufficiently explained its denial to allow for
meaningful appellate review” (internal quotation marks omitted)). We therefore affirm the
district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished