Bro Hesed-El v. County of Buncombe

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Bro Hesed-El v. County of Buncombe

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1869 Doc: 16 Filed: 11/07/2022 Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1869

BRO T. HESED-EL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE, in its official capacity,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

JOHN DOE, in his individual capacity; ROBIN BRYSON, Licensed Clinical Social Worker, in her official capacity; MISSION HOSPITALS, INCORPORATED, in its official capacity,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:19-cv-00285-MR-WCM)

Submitted: September 21, 2022 Decided: November 7, 2022

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. USCA4 Appeal: 21-1869 Doc: 16 Filed: 11/07/2022 Pg: 2 of 3

Bro T. Hesed-El, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis William Euler, BUNCOMBE COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 USCA4 Appeal: 21-1869 Doc: 16 Filed: 11/07/2022 Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:

Bro T. Hesed-El appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation

of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Hesed-El’s

42 U.S.C. § 1983

complaint and

denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny Hesed-El’s motions for appointment of counsel and to strike

Appellee’s informal response brief, and we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished