Kui Zheng v. Merrick Garland

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Kui Zheng v. Merrick Garland

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1778 Doc: 23 Filed: 11/21/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1778

KUI ZHENG,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: September 20, 2022 Decided: November 21, 2022

Before DIAZ and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Zhou Wang, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Brian Boynton, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Anna Juarez, Senior Litigation Counsel, Robert Michael Stalzer, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-1778 Doc: 23 Filed: 11/21/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Kui Zheng, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal

from the Immigration Judge’s decision denying his application for asylum. We have

thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that the evidence does not compel a ruling

contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that

substantial evidence supports the denial of relief, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias,

502 U.S. 478, 481

(1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the

Board. In re Zheng (B.I.A. June 29, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished