James Freeman v. SAIC
James Freeman v. SAIC
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 20-2371 Doc: 22 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-2371
JAMES FREEMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a/k/a SAIC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:19-cv-01502-LMB-MSN)
Submitted: November 17, 2022 Decided: November 22, 2022
Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Christopher E. Brown, THE BROWN FIRM PLLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Kimberley Lunetta, Miami, Florida, Matthew J. Sharbaugh, Zachary S. Stinson, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 20-2371 Doc: 22 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
James Freeman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for partial
summary judgment and granting Defendant summary judgment on Freeman’s
discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
Freeman v. Sci. Applications Int’l Corp., No. 1:19-cv-01502-LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. Nov.
24, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished