U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2022

James Freeman v. SAIC

James Freeman v. SAIC
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 22, 2022

James Freeman v. SAIC

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 20-2371 Doc: 22 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-2371

JAMES FREEMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a/k/a SAIC, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:19-cv-01502-LMB-MSN)

Submitted: November 17, 2022 Decided: November 22, 2022

Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Christopher E. Brown, THE BROWN FIRM PLLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Kimberley Lunetta, Miami, Florida, Matthew J. Sharbaugh, Zachary S.

Stinson, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 20-2371 Doc: 22 Filed: 11/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: James Freeman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for partial summary judgment and granting Defendant summary judgment on Freeman’s discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

Freeman v. Sci. Applications Int’l Corp., No. 1:19-cv-01502-LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. Nov.

24, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.