U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2022

United States v. Ray Prosise

United States v. Ray Prosise
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 28, 2022

United States v. Ray Prosise

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6091 Doc: 16 Filed: 11/28/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6091

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RAY PROSISE, a/k/a Steiner, a/k/a Raymond Prosise, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cr-00322-HEH-1)

Submitted: November 22, 2022 Decided: November 28, 2022

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ray Prosise, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Calvin Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6091 Doc: 16 Filed: 11/28/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Ray Prosise appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under § 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Prosise, No. 3:07-cr-00322-HEH-1 (E.D.

Va. Jan. 21, 2022). Prosise’s motions for appointment of counsel and to remand are denied.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.