U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2022

Hazel Stoudemire, Jr. v. Sergeant Thomas

Hazel Stoudemire, Jr. v. Sergeant Thomas
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 28, 2022

Hazel Stoudemire, Jr. v. Sergeant Thomas

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6280 Doc: 18 Filed: 11/28/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6280

HAZEL STOUDEMIRE, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SERGEANT THOMAS, Prison Guard; LIEUTENANT PRIESTER; CAPTAIN LIVINGSTON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:21-cv-01230-JFA)

Submitted: November 22, 2022 Decided: November 28, 2022

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hazel Stoudemire, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, DAVIDSON, WREN & DEMASTERS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6280 Doc: 18 Filed: 11/28/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Hazel Stoudemire, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Stoudemire’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his state law claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Stoudemire v. Thomas, No. 2:21-cv- 01230-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 1, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.