United States v. Raheem Oliver

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Raheem Oliver

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6516 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/29/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6516

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RAHEEM OLIVER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:18-cr-00009-CMH-1)

Submitted: November 22, 2022 Decided: November 29, 2022

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raheem Oliver, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6516 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/29/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Raheem Oliver appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

compassionate release under

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(1)(A)(i). We review a district court’s

denial of a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. See United States v.

Kibble,

992 F.3d 326, 329

(4th Cir.), cert. denied,

142 S. Ct. 383

(2021). We have reviewed

the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion and sufficiently

explained the reasons for the denial. See United States v. High,

997 F.3d 181, 188-91

(4th

Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of explanation required for denial of compassionate release

motion). We therefore affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Oliver, No. 1:18-

cr-00009-CMH-1 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 18, 2022 & entered Apr. 19, 2022 ). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished