U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2022

Stanley Corbett, Jr. v. James Candelario

Stanley Corbett, Jr. v. James Candelario
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 29, 2022

Stanley Corbett, Jr. v. James Candelario

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6894 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/29/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6894

STANLEY EARL CORBETT, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMES HENRY CANDELARIO; CURTIS MURRAY; JAMIE EMMANUEL HOLMES; OFFICER MIZZELLE; ISLAM AYESH; OFFICER PERKINS; MR. HATLEY; OFFICER FISHER; OFFICER HALE; OFFICER GRANDY, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:19-ct-03361-M)

Submitted: November 22, 2022 Decided: November 29, 2022

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6894 Doc: 8 Filed: 11/29/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Stanley Earl Corbett, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motions for default judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Corbett seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.