Michelet Saint Louis v. Ms. Woodson
Michelet Saint Louis v. Ms. Woodson
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6827 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/29/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6827
MICHELET SAINT LOUIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MS. WOODSON, Head of Record Department; DR. TUASON, Psychiatrist; MAJOR BATEMAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, Senior District Judge. (2:19-cv-00437-RAJ-LRL)
Submitted: November 22, 2022 Decided: November 29, 2022
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michelet Saint Louis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6827 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/29/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Michelet Saint Louis appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion
for summary judgment and dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983complaint for failure to
exhaust administrative remedies. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in
the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Saint Louis’ informal brief does not
challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of
the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey,
775 F.3d 170, 177(4th Cir. 2014) (“The
informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited
to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
We deny Saint Louis’ motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished