Deondre Russell v. U.S. Marshal
Deondre Russell v. U.S. Marshal
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6713 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/29/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6713
DEONDRE MONTREAL RUSSELL,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
U.S. MARSHAL,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:21-hc-02200-M)
Submitted: October 21, 2022 Decided: November 29, 2022
Before THACKER, HARRIS, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Deondre Montreal Russell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6713 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/29/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Deondre Montreal Russell appeals the district court’s order dismissing without
prejudice his
28 U.S.C. § 2241petition challenging his pretrial detention. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Specifically, Russell has not shown that
the district court erred in determining that he failed to exhaust his available remedies. See
Timms v. Johns,
627 F.3d 525, 530-31(4th Cir. 2020) (noting in absence of extraordinary
circumstances, petitioner must exhaust alternative remedies prior to seeking a writ of
habeas corpus). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Russell v. U.S. Marshal,
No. 5:21-hc-02200-M (E.D.N.C. June 3, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished