Deondre Russell v. U.S. Marshal
Deondre Russell v. U.S. Marshal
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6713 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/29/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6713
DEONDRE MONTREAL RUSSELL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. U.S. MARSHAL, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:21-hc-02200-M)
Submitted: October 21, 2022 Decided: November 29, 2022
Before THACKER, HARRIS, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Deondre Montreal Russell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6713 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/29/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Deondre Montreal Russell appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his pretrial detention. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Specifically, Russell has not shown that the district court erred in determining that he failed to exhaust his available remedies. See Timms v. Johns, 627 F.3d 525, 530-31 (4th Cir. 2020) (noting in absence of extraordinary circumstances, petitioner must exhaust alternative remedies prior to seeking a writ of habeas corpus). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Russell v. U.S. Marshal, No. 5:21-hc-02200-M (E.D.N.C. June 3, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.