United States v. Jacobo Posso
United States v. Jacobo Posso
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6126 Doc: 15 Filed: 12/08/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6126
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JACOBO ROZO POSSO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:18-cr-00120-TDS-1; 1:19- cv-00906-TDS-JLW)
Submitted: October 31, 2022 Decided: December 8, 2022
Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeremy Brian Gordon, JEREMY GORDON, PLLC, Mansfield, Texas, for Appellant.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6126 Doc: 15 Filed: 12/08/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jacobo Rozo Posso seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Posso’s
28 U.S.C. § 2255and Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motions. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or
judge issues a certificate of appealability. See
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of
appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional
right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a
prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the
district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis,
137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74(2017).
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Posso has not made
the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished