United States v. Justin Strom

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Justin Strom

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6850 Doc: 6 Filed: 12/20/2022 Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6655

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JUSTIN DEONTA STROM, a/k/a Jae Dee, a/k/a Jae, a/k/a J-Dirt,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 22-6850

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JUSTIN DEONTA STROM, a/k/a Jae Dee, a/k/a Jae, a/k/a J-Dirt,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:12-cr-00159-LMB-1)

Submitted: December 15, 2022 Decided: December 20, 2022 USCA4 Appeal: 22-6850 Doc: 6 Filed: 12/20/2022 Pg: 2 of 3

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Justin Deonta Strom, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 USCA4 Appeal: 22-6850 Doc: 6 Filed: 12/20/2022 Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated cases, Justin Deonta Strom appeals the district court’s orders

denying Strom’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motions to correct purported clerical errors in his

presentence report and criminal judgment. Upon review of the record, we discern no error

in the district court’s rulings on Strom’s motions. Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s orders. United States v. Strom, No. 1:12-cr-00159-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. May 24, 2022;

July 14, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished