Joel Burrell v. William Anderson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Joel Burrell v. William Anderson

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6950 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/20/2022 Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6870

JOEL AARON BURRELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM J. ANDERSON, Lt. Col. Assistant Superintendent; DAVID HACKWORTH, Superintendent (previous); C. WALZ, Asst. Superintendent (previous); A. BOYER, Sgt.; K. MURPHY, Lieutenant; BHAGIRATH, Captain; D. SHIRLEY, Correctional Officer; JONES, Corporal; SCADD, Correctional Officer; JANE DOE, Wellpath Employee; L. JONES, Sergeant; GREEN, (Female), Corporal; JANE DOE, Correctional Officer; A. CASPER, Sergeant; CLARK, Doctor; P. WESTBROOK-SCOTT, Health Service Administrator,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 22-6950

JOEL AARON BURRELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM ANDERSON, Lt. Col. Assistant Superintendent; DAVID HACKWORTH, Superintendent (previous); C. WALZ, Asst. Superintendent (previous); A. BOYER, Sgt.; K. MURPHY, Lieutenant; BHAGIRATH, Captain; D. SHIRLEY, Correctional Officer; JONES, Corporal; SCADD, Correctional Officer; JANE DOE, Wellpath Employee; L. JONES, Sergeant; GREEN, (Female), Corporal; JANE DOE, Correctional Officer; A. CASPER, Sergeant; CLARK, Doctor; P. WESTBROOK-SCOTT, Health Service Administrator, USCA4 Appeal: 22-6950 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/20/2022 Pg: 2 of 3

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00864-TSE-TCB)

Submitted: December 15, 2022 Decided: December 20, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joel Aaron Burrell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 USCA4 Appeal: 22-6950 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/20/2022 Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:

Joel Aaron Burrell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

complaint without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to comply with a court

order and the court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Burrell v. Anderson, No. 1:21-cv-00864-TSE-TCB (E.D. Va. June 29,

2022; Aug. 3, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished