USCA4 Appeal: 22-1986 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1986

ANTHONY G. BRYANT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS; HOMELAND SECURITY, ICE; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph Dawson, III, District Judge. (2:22-cv-00605-JD-MGB)

Submitted: December 20, 2022 Decided: December 22, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony G. Bryant, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1986 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony G. Bryant appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to proceed

in forma pauperis and requiring him to pay the full filing fee to proceed with his civil

action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,

, and

certain interlocutory and collateral orders,

; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen

v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,

(1949). An order denying a motion

to proceed in forma pauperis is an appealable interlocutory order. Roberts v. U.S. Dist. Ct.,

(1950) (per curiam). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Bryant v. Admin. Off. of the U.S.

Cts., No. 2:22-cv-00605-JD-MGB (D.S.C. Sept. 1, 2022). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2