United States v. Dominick Johnson
United States v. Dominick Johnson
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 22-7053 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-7053
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DOMINICK LARENZO JOHNSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (6:16-cr-00761-TMC-1)
Submitted: December 20, 2022 Decided: December 27, 2022
Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dominick Larenzo Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7053 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Dominick Larenzo Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order in his
28 U.S.C. § 2255proceeding granting his motion to amend, directing the clerk to mail him a copy of
the Government’s amended motion for summary judgment and an order under Roseboro v.
Garrison,
528 F.2d 309(4th Cir. 1975) (per curiam), and dismissing his
28 U.S.C. § 2241petition without prejudice and with leave to refile. This court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-47(1949). The order Johnson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished