Terry Reamer v. State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company
Terry Reamer v. State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 21-2432 Doc: 24 Filed: 12/29/2022 Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2432
TERRY K. REAMER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Melvin Kabik; TERRY K. REAMER, as Trustee of the Melvin Kabik Revocable Trust,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
STATE AUTOMOBILE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
Defendant,
v.
INTELLIGENT INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS; SANTANA NOTTAGE,
Third Party Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-02987-CCB)
Submitted: November 21, 2022 Decided: December 29, 2022
Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. USCA4 Appeal: 21-2432 Doc: 24 Filed: 12/29/2022 Pg: 2 of 3
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Jonathan A. Azrael, AZRAEL, FRANZ, SCHWAB, LIPOWITZ & SOLTER, LLC, Towson, Maryland, for Appellant. Matthew B. Malamud, HORST KREKSTEIN & RUNYON LLC, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 USCA4 Appeal: 21-2432 Doc: 24 Filed: 12/29/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Terry K. Reamer, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Melvin Kabik and as
Trustee of the Melvin Kabik Revocable Trust, brought an action against State Automobile
Mutual Insurance Company (“State Auto”) alleging breach of contract. ∗ She appeals from
the district court’s orders granting State Auto’s motion to dismiss her complaint and
denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the
arguments presented by the parties, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reamer v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co.,
No. 1:20-cv-02987-CCB (D. Md. Aug. 23, 2021; Dec. 20, 2021). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗ Reamer also alleged negligence and conversion by Bank of America National Association. She does not contest on appeal the district court’s entry of judgment on the pleadings in favor of Bank of America.
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished