Bruce Buckner v. Daniel Porter

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Bruce Buckner v. Daniel Porter

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6636 Doc: 16 Filed: 12/29/2022 Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6636

BRUCE ALLEN BUCKNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DANIEL PORTER, York County Solicitor,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 22-6637

BRUCE ALLEN BUCKNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DAVID HAMILTON, York County Clerk of Court; YORK COUNTY CLERK OF COURT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (0:21-cv-03873-TLW; 0:21-cv-03874- TLW)

Submitted: November 23, 2022 Decided: December 29, 2022 USCA4 Appeal: 22-6636 Doc: 16 Filed: 12/29/2022 Pg: 2 of 3

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce Allen Buckner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 USCA4 Appeal: 22-6636 Doc: 16 Filed: 12/29/2022 Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Bruce Allen Buckner appeals the district court’s

orders and judgments accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his complaints. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny Buckner’s motions to clarify, for a stay, and to

vacate. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished