U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2023

Jeffrey Pleasant v. Mark Breckon

Jeffrey Pleasant v. Mark Breckon
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 4, 2023

Jeffrey Pleasant v. Mark Breckon

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6071 Doc: 8 Filed: 01/04/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6071

JEFFREY A. PLEASANT, Petitioner - Appellant, v. MARK BRECKON, Warden, United States Penitentiary Lee, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:19-cv-00200-MFU-JCH)

Submitted: November 29, 2022 Decided: January 4, 2023

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey A. Pleasant, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6071 Doc: 8 Filed: 01/04/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Jeffrey A. Pleasant appeals the district court’s orders dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and denying reconsideration. Applying the principles as set forth in our recent decision in Slusser v. Vereen, 36 F.4th 590, 594-96 (4th Cir. 2022), we agree with the district court that Pleasant failed to satisfy the requirements of the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e). Accordingly, having reviewed the record and finding no reversible error, we affirm the district court’s orders. Pleasant v. Breckon, No. 7:19-cv-00200-MFU-JCH (W.D. Va. Mar. 20, 2020; Jan. 11, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.