Lee Webb v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Lee Webb v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1784 Doc: 7 Filed: 02/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1784
LEE ANDREW WEBB, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:22-cv-00139-JAG)
Submitted: February 16, 2023 Decided: February 21, 2023
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING, Circuit Judge, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lee Andrew Webb, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1784 Doc: 7 Filed: 02/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Lee Andrew Webb appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to timely file an amended complaint as directed. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Webb’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.