Alvine Nono Fotso v. Merrick Garland
Alvine Nono Fotso v. Merrick Garland
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1865 Doc: 15 Filed: 02/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1865
ALVINE CASSANDRA NONO FOTSO, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: April 14, 2022 Decided: February 21, 2023
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, Circuit Judge, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Godwill C. Tachi, TACHI LAW FIRM, LLC, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Petitioner. Brian Boynton, Acting Assistant Attorney General, John S. Hogan, Assistant Director, Office of Immigration Litigation, Matthew A. Spurlock, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1865 Doc: 15 Filed: 02/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Alvine Cassandra Nono Fotso, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b)(1) (2021). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. In re Nono Fotso, (B.I.A. July 12, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.