United States v. Ronnie Bowman
United States v. Ronnie Bowman
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6956 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/22/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6956
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RONNIE BOWMAN, a/k/a Young, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:01-cr-00349-CMC-1)
Submitted: February 16, 2023 Decided: February 22, 2023
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING, Circuit Judge, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronnie Bowman, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Neale Garner, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6956 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/22/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Ronnie Bowman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. We review a district court’s order granting or denying a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion.
See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (providing standard), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief after analyzing the relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. See United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 189 (4th Cir. 2021).
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bowman, No. 3:01-cr-00349-CMC-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 8, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.