USCA4 Appeal: 22-6990 Doc: 17 Filed: 02/22/2023 Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6937

BRUMAN STALIN ALVAREZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ASRESAHEGN GETACHEW, In his individual and official capacities for actions under color of law as Medical Director, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Defendant - Appellee.

No. 22-6990

BRUMAN STALIN ALVAREZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ASRESAHEGN GETACHEW, In his individual and official capacities for actions under color of law as Medical Director, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

Paula Xinis, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00141-PX)

Submitted: January 19, 2023 Decided: February 22, 2023 USCA4 Appeal: 22-6990 Doc: 17 Filed: 02/22/2023 Pg: 2 of 3

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruman Stalin Alvarez, Appellant Pro Se. Kamil Ismail, Kelly Hughes Iverson, GOODELL DEVRIES LEECH & DANN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6990 Doc: 17 Filed: 02/22/2023 Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Bruman Stalin Alvarez, a Maryland inmate, appeals the district court’s judgment entered after trial and the order denying Alvarez’s motion for a new trial. Alvarez fails to show any error in the jury instructions. He also fails to show that counsel was ineffective to the extent that we should reverse due to plain error. Lastly, we have reviewed de novo that district court’s order granting summary judgment to Wexford Health Sources, Inc., and find no error. See Ballengee v. CBS Broad., Inc., 968 F.3d 344, 349 (4th Cir. 2020) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Alvarez’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED