Johnathan Fuller v. Denise Jackson
Johnathan Fuller v. Denise Jackson
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6265 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/23/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6265
JOHNATHAN A. FULLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DENISE JACKSON; STEPHEN WADDELL; TODD E. ISHEE; ERIC HOOKS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:21-ct-03206-FL)
Submitted: February 21, 2023 Decided: February 23, 2023
Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Johnathan A. Fuller, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6265 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/23/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Johnathan A. Fuller appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Limiting our review of the record to the issues raised in Fuller’s informal brief, we conclude that Fuller has forfeited review of his excessive force and stolen property claims, and we otherwise find no reversible error.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Fuller v. Jackson, No. 5:21-ct-03206-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.