Aryee Henderson v. LaShawn Peeples
Aryee Henderson v. LaShawn Peeples
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 21-6253 Doc: 26 Filed: 05/10/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-6253
ARYEE HENDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LASHAWN PEEPLES, Associate Warden; GREGORY WASHINGTON, Associate Warden; JAMES PARRISH, Associate Warden; MICHAEL STEPHAN, Warden; MS. GASQUE, Grievance Coordinator, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (4:19-cv-01861-BHH)
Submitted: April 14, 2023 Decided: May 10, 2023
Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aryee Henderson, Appellant Pro Se. Brian L. Craven, Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., MCKAY FIRM, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 21-6253 Doc: 26 Filed: 05/10/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Aryee Henderson appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and granting summary judgment to Defendants on Henderson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court correctly determined that Henderson failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies prior to filing his complaint. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Henderson v. Peeples, No. 4:19-cv-01861-BHH (D.S.C. Nov. 19, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.