Christopher Young v. Argos USA, LLC
Christopher Young v. Argos USA, LLC
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 21-2216 Doc: 20 Filed: 06/16/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-2216
CHRISTOPHER YOUNG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ARGOS USA, LLC, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (9:19-cv-03073-BHH)
Submitted: March 7, 2023 Decided: June 16, 2023
Before AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Joshua R. Fester, LAW OFFICE OF DARRELL THOMAS JOHNSON, JR, Hardeeville, South Carolina, for Appellant. Rodney A. Satterwhite, Igor Babichenko, MCGUIREWOODS LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 21-2216 Doc: 20 Filed: 06/16/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Christopher Young appeals the district court’s order granting Argos USA, LLC’s motion to dismiss his complaint, in which Young raised claims of wrongful discharge in violation of public policy, defamation, retaliatory termination in violation of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h), and abuse of process, as well as the court’s order denying Young’s motions for reconsideration and to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Young v. Argos USA, LLC, No. 9:19-cv-03073-BHH (D.S.C. Oct. 26, 2020 & Sept. 21, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.