Joseph Fuce, II v. Stanley Middleman
Joseph Fuce, II v. Stanley Middleman
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1240 Doc: 12 Filed: 06/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1240
JOSEPH FUCE, II, absolute trustee cestui que trust/beneficiary Internal Revenue Service, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STANLEY MIDDLEMAN, d/b/a Freedom Mortgage Corporation; BRYAN JAY KOON, Sheriff; OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF, Lexington County, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (3:22-cv-03561-MGL)
Submitted: June 15, 2023 Decided: June 21, 2023
Before DIAZ, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Fuce, II, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1240 Doc: 12 Filed: 06/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Joseph Fuce, II, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Fuce’s civil action pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman ∗ abstention doctrine. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Fuce v. Middleman, No. 3:22-cv-03561- MGL (D.S.C. Feb. 7, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
D.C. Ct. of App. v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Tr. Co., 263 U.S. ∗ (1923).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.