U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2023

Franklin Davis v. Roanoke Public Defenders

Franklin Davis v. Roanoke Public Defenders
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 27, 2023

Franklin Davis v. Roanoke Public Defenders

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6242 Doc: 13 Filed: 06/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6242

FRANKLIN W. DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROANOKE PUBLIC DEFENDERS; JUDGE CARSON; CRYSTAL SMITH, Commonwealth’s Attorney, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (7:22-cv-00678-JPJ-PMS)

Submitted: June 22, 2023 Decided: June 27, 2023

Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Franklin W. Davis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6242 Doc: 13 Filed: 06/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Franklin W. Davis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Davis’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.