Kathy Allen v. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
Kathy Allen v. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1528 Doc: 23 Filed: 07/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1528
KATHY R. ALLEN; JAY K. ALLEN, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant - Appellee, and METLIFE; MERCER HEALTH BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION, LLC; LINCOLN HERITAGE LIFE INSURANCE CO., Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:21-cv-00174-D)
Submitted: July 25, 2023 Decided: July 27, 2023
Before WYNN and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kathy R. Allen, Jay K. Allen, Appellants Pro Se. Michael Douglas McKnight, Savannah Trimmer, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Raleigh, North USCA4 Appeal: 22-1528 Doc: 23 Filed: 07/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 3
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1528 Doc: 23 Filed: 07/27/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM: Kathy R. Allen and Jay K. Allen (collectively, Appellants) appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their civil complaint and denying their motion for reconsideration.
Because the notice of appeal was filed more than 30 days after the court entered the order dismissing the complaint, that order is not properly before this court. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). With respect to the court’s order denying Appellants’ postjudgment motion, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s postjudgment order. We also deny all pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.