Paul Shegonee v. Warden Streeval
Paul Shegonee v. Warden Streeval
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6612 Doc: 13 Filed: 08/11/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6612
PAUL D. SHEGONEE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN STREEVAL, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (7:21-cv-00162-MFU-PMS)
Submitted: August 8, 2023 Decided: August 11, 2023
Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul D. Shegonee, Appellant Pro Se. S. Cagle Juhan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6612 Doc: 13 Filed: 08/11/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Paul D. Shegonee, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction. In light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Jones v. Hendrix, 143 S. Ct. 1857, 1868-69 (2023) (holding that petitioner cannot use § 2241 petition by way of the savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e) to mount successive collateral attack on validity of federal conviction), we conclude that Shegonee cannot pursue his claim in a § 2241 petition.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order dismissing Shegonee’s § 2241 petition. Shegonee v. Streeval, No. 7:21-cv-00162-MFU-PMS (W.D. Va. May 3, 2022).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.