James Kane v. United States
James Kane v. United States
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 20-6839 Doc: 52 Filed: 10/02/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6839
JAMES F. KANE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:19-cv-00238-MR)
Submitted: September 28, 2023 Decided: October 2, 2023
Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Anthony Martinez, Federal Public Defender, Joshua B. Carpenter, Appellate Chief, FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. William T. Stetzer, Acting United States Attorney, Elizabeth M. Greenough, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 20-6839 Doc: 52 Filed: 10/02/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: James F. Kane appeals the district court’s order dismissing Kane’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for lack of jurisdiction. In light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Jones v. Hendrix, 143 S. Ct. 1857, 1867-69 (2023) (holding that petitioner cannot use § 2241 petition to mount successive collateral attack on validity of federal sentence), we conclude that Kane cannot pursue his challenge in a § 2241 petition.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order dismissing Kane’s § 2241 petition.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.