Martinez Black v. Lawrence Parsons
Martinez Black v. Lawrence Parsons
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6509 Doc: 14 Filed: 10/03/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6509
MARTINEZ ORLANDIS BLACK, Peitioner - Appellant, v. LAWRENCE PARSONS, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00286-RJC)
Submitted: September 28, 2023 Decided: October 3, 2023
Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Martinez Orlandis Black, Appellant Pro Se. Kristin Jo Uicker, Assistant Attorney General, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6509 Doc: 14 Filed: 10/03/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Martinez Orlandis Black seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as time-barred. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court entered its order on February 13, 2013. Black filed the notice of appeal on May 2, 2023. * Because Black failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date Black could have delivered the notice to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.