U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2023

Mark Panowicz v. Sharon Hancock

Mark Panowicz v. Sharon Hancock
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 23, 2023

Mark Panowicz v. Sharon Hancock

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1628 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/23/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1628

MARK A. PANOWICZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SHARON L. HANCOCK, in individual capacity; LISA YATES, Clerk of the Circuit Court for Charles County (in official capacity), Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.

Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:11-cv-02417-DKC)

Submitted: October 19, 2023 Decided: October 23, 2023

Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark A. Panowicz, Appellant Pro Se. Kathryn Elizabeth Hummel, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1628 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/23/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM: Mark A. Panowicz appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4)-(6), (d)(3) motions and his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Panowicz v. Hancock, No. 8:11-cv-02417-DKC (D. Md. Apr. 28 & May 31, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.