Mithun Banerjee v. Bank of America, N.A.
Mithun Banerjee v. Bank of America, N.A.
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 22-2182 Doc: 34 Filed: 11/02/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-2182
MITHUN BANERJEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; VIVIANA QUISHPE-NARVAEZ; THE CORPORATION TRUST, INCORPORATED; TESSA L. FREDERICK; JEFFREY P. REILLY; MILES & STOCKBRIDGE P. C., 100 Light Street, Baltimore Md 21202; ROSALYN TANG; STEPHEN J. MCAULIFFE, III; MILES & STOCKBRIDGE P. C., 11 N Washington St #700, Rockville, MD 20850, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:21-cv-03110-TDC)
Submitted: October 31, 2023 Decided: November 2, 2023
Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mithun Banerjee, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-2182 Doc: 34 Filed: 11/02/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Mithun Banerjee appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders.
Banerjee v. Bank of Am., N.A., No. 8:21-cv-03110-TDC (D. Md. Aug. 4, 2022, and Oct. 12, 2022). We also deny Banerjee’s motion to assign counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.