Miguel Angel Rivera v. Wayne Hill
Miguel Angel Rivera v. Wayne Hill
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6065 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/15/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6065
MIGUEL ANGEL RIVERA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DIRECTOR WAYNE O. HILL; WARDEN AT J.C.I. ALLEN K. GANG; SERGEANT AT J.C.I. MR. LEE; SERGEANT AT J.C.I. MR. LEPA; OFFICER AT J.C.I. MS. JACKSON; SERGEANT AT J.C.I. MR. MESSON; OFFICER AT J.C.I.
MR. ASONGOING; WARDEN AT W.C.I. RONALD S. WEBER; COREY WALKER, Western Correctional Case Manager; OFFICER A. ZEMBOWER, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Paula Xinis, District Judge. (1:22-cv-01517-PX)
Submitted: October 26, 2023 Decided: November 15, 2023
Before QUATTLEBAUM and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Miguel A. Rivera-Alvarez, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6065 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/15/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Miguel A. Rivera-Alvarez appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice * his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim for relief under U.S.C. § 1915A(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Rivera-Alvarez v. Hill, No. 1:22-cv- 01517-PX (D. Md. Dec. 19, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Because the district court dismissed the action without allowing Rivera-Alvarez a further opportunity to amend the complaint, the order is final and appealable. See Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 796 (4th Cir. 2022).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.