United States v. Keith Pyndell
United States v. Keith Pyndell
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6906 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/20/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6906
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KEITH PYNDELL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cr-00024-AJT-1)
Submitted: October 20, 2023 Decided: November 20, 2023
Before RICHARDSON and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Pyndell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6906 Doc: 6 Filed: 11/20/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Keith Pyndell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release. Because Pyndell does not dispute
the district court’s finding that neither his medical conditions nor his family circumstances
constituted an extraordinary and compelling basis for relief, we consider those issues
waived. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey,
775 F.3d 170, 177(4th Cir. 2014) (“The
informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited
to issues preserved in that brief.”). In addition, we agree with the court’s determination
that Pyndell cannot use a compassionate release motion to attack the validity of his criminal
judgment. United States v. Ferguson,
55 F.4th 262, 270 (4th Cir. 2022).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished