Willie Martin, III v. Mary Locklear

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Willie Martin, III v. Mary Locklear

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6499 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/22/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6499

WILLIE LEE MARTIN, III,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARY LOCKLEAR; TODD ISHEE; ROY COOPER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:22-ct-03072-BO)

Submitted: November 16, 2023 Decided: November 22, 2023

Before AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Lee Martin, III, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6499 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/22/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Willie Lee Martin, III, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B)(ii).

Martin was released from incarceration during the pendency of this appeal; thus, to the

extent Martin challenges the dismissal of his request for injunctive relief, the appeal is

moot. See Rendelman v. Rouse,

569 F.3d 182, 186

(4th Cir. 2009). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error in the district court’s dismissal of Martin’s claims for

damages. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal in part as moot and affirm the remainder of

the district court’s judgment. Martin v. Locklear, No. 5:22-ct-03072-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr.

28, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished