Jonathan Newell v. Ja'barri Davis
Jonathan Newell v. Ja'barri Davis
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6553 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/30/2024 Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6553
JONATHAN JAMES NEWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, and ROY G. DAVIDSON; ANTOINE JERROD WATKINS, Plaintiffs, v. JA’BARRI DAVIS, Correctional Officer; A. SINGLETON, Correctional Officer; SGT. JANE DOE DOWNEY; KIMBERLY HARRIS, Unit Manager of Granville Dorm, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:21-ct-03129-BO)
Submitted: July 19, 2024 Decided: July 30, 2024
Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6553 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/30/2024 Pg: 2 of 3
Jonathan James Newell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6553 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/30/2024 Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM: Jonathan James Newell seeks to appeal the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motion to reopen the case scheduling order and denying Newell’s subsequent motion to quash that order. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders Newell seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.