Dwayne Johnson v. Commonwealth of Virginia

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Dwayne Johnson v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6367 Doc: 8 Filed: 08/27/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6367

DWAYNE L. JOHNSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. (2:23-cv-00553-MSD-DEM)

Submitted: August 22, 2024 Decided: August 27, 2024

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwayne L. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6367 Doc: 8 Filed: 08/27/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Dwayne Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Johnson’s

28 U.S.C. § 2254

petition as successive and unauthorized. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See

28 U.S.C. § 2253

(c)(1)(A). A certificate

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.”

28 U.S.C. § 2253

(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief on procedural

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is

debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional

right. Gonzalez v. Thaler,

565 U.S. 134, 140-41

(2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel,

529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished