USCA4 Appeal: 24-1580 Doc: 30 Filed: 08/26/2024 Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1580

In re: 25350 PLEASANT VALLEY LLC.

------------------------------

ELSHAN BAYRAMOV,

Appellant, v.

25350 PLEASANT VALLEY LLC,

Debtor - Appellee,

and

MAINSTREET BANK,

Creditor - Appellee,

and

JANET M. MEIBURGER, Chapter 7 Trustee,

Trustee - Appellee,

and

U.S. TRUSTEE,

Trustee. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1580 Doc: 30 Filed: 08/26/2024 Pg: 2 of 3

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Michael Stefan Nachmanoff, District Judge. (1:24-cv-00816-MSN-WBP)

Submitted: August 22, 2024 Decided: August 26, 2024

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elshan Bayramov, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Scott Schuster, FUNK & BOLTON, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Creditor - Appellee; Janet Marie Meiburger, MEIBURGER LAW FIRM, PC, McLean, Virginia, for Trustee - Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 USCA4 Appeal: 24-1580 Doc: 30 Filed: 08/26/2024 Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:

Elshan Bayramov appeals the district court’s order granting 25350 Pleasant Valley

LLC’s voluntary dismissal of its appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order converting its

Chapter 11 bankruptcy case to one under Chapter 7. Bayramov contends that the district

court erred by dismissing the appeal without addressing his pending motion to intervene.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Black v. Cent. Motor Lines,

Inc.,

(4th Cir. 1974) (“[W]henever an action is terminated, for whatever

reason, there no longer remains an action in which there can be intervention.”); see also

Moses v. City of Perry, Mich.,

(6th Cir. 2024) (affirming dismissal of

appeal and stating that dismissal mooted nonparty’s motion to intervene). Accordingly,

we affirm the district court’s order, Bayramov v. 25350 Pleasant Valley LLC, No. 1:24-cv-

00816-MSN-WBP (E.D. Va. filed June 13, 2024; entered June 14, 2024), and we deny

Bayramov’s motion to stay the proceedings pending appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3