Casey Tyler v. Pamela Rouse

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Casey Tyler v. Pamela Rouse

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6061 Doc: 19 Filed: 08/30/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6061

CASEY RAFAEL TYLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PAMELA ROUSE; TODD ISHEE; JAMES H. CLARE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:22-ct-03146-D)

Submitted: August 27, 2024 Decided: August 30, 2024

Before KING and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Casey Rafael Tyler, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth L. Jones, CARRUTHERS & ROTH, PA, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees Kenneth L. Jones and James H. Clare.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6061 Doc: 19 Filed: 08/30/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Casey Rafael Tyler appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motions

for summary judgment, denying Tyler’s motion for summary judgment, and denying

Tyler’s motion for reconsideration in his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

action. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders.

Tyler v. Rouse, No. 5:22-ct-03146-D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2023; Jan. 8, 2024). We deny

Tyler’s motions for initial hearing en banc and to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished