Casey Tyler v. Pamela Rouse
Casey Tyler v. Pamela Rouse
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6061 Doc: 19 Filed: 08/30/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6061
CASEY RAFAEL TYLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PAMELA ROUSE; TODD ISHEE; JAMES H. CLARE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:22-ct-03146-D)
Submitted: August 27, 2024 Decided: August 30, 2024
Before KING and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Casey Rafael Tyler, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth L. Jones, CARRUTHERS & ROTH, PA, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees Kenneth L. Jones and James H. Clare.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6061 Doc: 19 Filed: 08/30/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Casey Rafael Tyler appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motions
for summary judgment, denying Tyler’s motion for summary judgment, and denying
Tyler’s motion for reconsideration in his
42 U.S.C. § 1983action. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders.
Tyler v. Rouse, No. 5:22-ct-03146-D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2023; Jan. 8, 2024). We deny
Tyler’s motions for initial hearing en banc and to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished