Arben Gjika v. Merrick Garland
Arben Gjika v. Merrick Garland
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1983 Doc: 21 Filed: 08/30/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1983
ARBEN GJIKA, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: July 18, 2024 Decided: August 30, 2024
Before WILKINSON and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Brad Banias, BANIAS LAW, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Anthony C.
Payne, Assistant Director, Jennifer A. Bowen, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1983 Doc: 21 Filed: 08/30/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM: Arben Gjika, a native and citizen of Albania, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) granting Gjika’s motion to reconsider but declining to reopen its discretionary denial of Gjika’s request for a § 212(i) waiver of inadmissibility.
See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(i)(1). Upon review, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider Gjika’s claims challenging the Board’s refusal to reopen its discretion-based decision. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1182(i)(2), 1252(a)(2)(B)(i). While we retain jurisdiction to review constitutional claims and questions of law, 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D), Gjika’s claims do not so qualify. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction. In re Gjika (B.I.A. Aug. 25, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.