Jasmine Golden v. North Carolina A&T State University

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Jasmine Golden v. North Carolina A&T State University

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1628 Doc: 10 Filed: 09/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1628

JASMINE E. GOLDEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL AND TECHNICAL STATE UNIVERSITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:23-cv-00381-TDS-LPA)

Submitted: September 12, 2024 Decided: September 16, 2024

Before THACKER and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jasmine E. Golden, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1628 Doc: 10 Filed: 09/16/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Jasmine E. Golden seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her

post-judgment motion for additional time to object to the magistrate judge’s

recommendation. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of

appeal was not timely filed.

In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final

judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell,

551 U.S. 205, 214

(2007).

The district court entered its order on May 16, 2024, and the appeal period expired

on June 17, 2024. Golden filed the notice of appeal on July 8, 2024. Because Golden

failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal

period, we dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished