Wilson Ochar v. Lentegrity

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Wilson Ochar v. Lentegrity

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1648 Doc: 16 Filed: 09/23/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1648

WILSON OCHAR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LENTEGRITY; MERLEX AUTO GROUP,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:24-cv-00926-CMH-WBP)

Submitted: September 19, 2024 Decided: September 23, 2024

Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilson Ochar, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1648 Doc: 16 Filed: 09/23/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Wilson Ochar appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to proceed in

forma pauperis. See Roberts v. U.S. Dist. Ct.,

339 U.S. 844, 845

(1950) (per curiam)

(holding that order denying motion to proceed in forma pauperis is appealable interlocutory

order). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

the district court’s order. Ochar v. Lentegrity, No. 1:24-cv-00926-CMH-WBP (E.D. Va.

June 27, 2024). In addition, we deny each of Ochar’s pending motions. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished