Joe Teague, Jr. v. Arthur Gepner
Joe Teague, Jr. v. Arthur Gepner
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1393 Doc: 6 Filed: 09/23/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1393
JOE EDWARDS TEAGUE, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ARTHUR L. GEPNER, for Cherokee Federal d/b/a CN3S; BOBBY DETTMER, Flux Resources LLC; CLINT BUCKLEY, Flux Resources LLC; ELLIE MUHR, Flux Resources LLC; KATARINA HARDING, DEMSI; SETH WAGNER, Cherokee Federal d/b/a CN3S,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:22-cv-00436-BO-BM)
Submitted: September 19, 2024 Decided: September 23, 2024
Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joe Edwards Teague, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1393 Doc: 6 Filed: 09/23/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Joe Edwards Teague, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders adopting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss, on
28 U.S.C. § 1915review, Teague’s civil
complaint and denying what the court appropriately construed as a Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)
motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s orders. Teague v. Gepner, No. 5:22-cv-00436-BO-BM (E.D.N.C. Jan.
19, 2024; Apr. 26, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished