Larry Blakney v. Merrick Garland
Larry Blakney v. Merrick Garland
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 24-6377 Doc: 12 Filed: 09/24/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6377
LARRY BLAKNEY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of U.S.; WARDEN T. SCARANTINO,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:24-hc-02067-M)
Submitted: September 19, 2024 Decided: September 24, 2024
Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Blakney, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6377 Doc: 12 Filed: 09/24/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Larry Blakney appeals the district court’s order dismissing for lack of exhaustion
his
28 U.S.C. § 2241petition challenging the propriety of his commitment to the custody
of the Attorney General pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 4246. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Blakney v.
Garland, No. 5:24-hc-02067-M (E.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 2024). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished